|
What
are the Benefits of Collaborative Family Law?
- It
creates an environment where communication remains open, where you can
work with your spouse to meet your families needs, now and in the
future.
- It
establishes a team instead of adversaries.
- Should
an expert opinion be needed, the team can jointly hire one independent
consultant. This can shorten duration and lessen the expense.
- Agreements
are shaped jointly, thus both parties are more likely to keep them.
- Parental
conflict is lessened, helping to protect the children from divided
loyalties.
- Meetings
can be scheduled without waiting for court dates. This can lessen the
time and money spent, as well as reduce the anxiety associated with
court proceedings.
- Because
you agree not to litigate, your issues stay within the team setting,
providing more privacy and less stress.
For
Whom is Collaborative Law a Good Idea?
Collaborative
Law is for divorcing couples who would like skilled legal representation,
but who do not want the stress and animosity caused by litigation.
For
What Type of Client Does Collaborative Law Work?
People
who have at least "a little good will" toward their spouse and
the desire to work out a settlement. Without that small bit of openness in
the process, collaborative law will probably not work. Collaborative law
requires clients who want to make their own decisions regarding their
lives, and who are capable of seeing more than one way to resolve an
issue.
Can
I Get Full Representation if I Agree Not to Litigate?
The
Collaborative lawyer does not give up the role of advocate for the client.
The clients have agreed to limit the lawyer's role to that of providing
representation for settlement purposes only. The client retains control.
Can
a Party Quit During the Process?
Yes.
A party may quit the collaborative process, however per the participation
agreement, the party must then hire other counsel. The other side will
also be hiring a litigator. Control may be lost.
Why
Must a Lawyer Resign if the Other Side Decides to Go to Court?
The
requirement that all lawyers must withdraw in the event of a breakdown,
assures that all counsel will be totally motivated to make the process
work.
How
is the Lawyer/Client Relationship Different?
The
lawyer never ceases to be the client's advocate, however, they will
encourage the client to be open about their needs and to listen to and
respect the other side's needs, the goal being a mutually agreeable
settlement.
Can
One Lawyer Practice Collaborative Law if the Other Side Has Not Signed a
Participation Agreement?
It
is generally assumed that all parties will sign the participation
agreement, however circumstances may vary so that only one attorney might
be hired for settlement purposes only.
How
is Collaborative Law Different from Mediation?
Mediation
involves the use of a third party neutral, and the attorneys still act as
adversaries. In collaborative cases lawyers and their clients will
negotiate with or without the use of a mediator.
What
is the end result of a Collaborative Law Case? How Are Interests, Rights,
and Agreements Secured?
The
parties can conclude however they wish. There are no formal limitations to
what parties can agree to do to solve their problems.
How
Does the Practice of Collaborative Law Affect Attorney's Fees?
Representation
and fee agreements between attorney and client are not directly affected
by the participation agreement. However, avoiding the cost of litigation,
trial preparation and court time will greatly reduce the overall cost of a
case.
What
Can Collaborative Lawyers Do If Negotiations Reach Impasse?
Collaborative
lawyers can agree to hire experts to advise and assist and a mediator can
be hired at any time.
Is
a Collaborative lawyer Required to Disclose Information That the Other
Side has not Requested, but which May be Important to the Case?
Yes.
In the Collaborative Law process, the attorneys and parties are committed
to providing each other with the information they need to resolve their
dispute.
What
happens if a Party Doesn't Fulfill its Disclosure obligation under the
Participation Agreement?
Participation
if the collaborative law process is based on premise that all (parties and
attorneys) have acted in good faith to reach a fair resolution. When an
attorney learns that his/her client has withheld or misrepresented
information, the participation agreement requires the collaborative lawyer
to withdraw.
What
if, sometime after entering into a Settlement Agreement as a result of a
Collaborative Law Process, a Collaborative Lawyer discovers that the other
party failed to disclose information that should have been disclosed?
Such
a Settlement Agreement is no different from any other negotiated
settlement agreement, and no more or less susceptible to being challenged
for such a reason.
What
if the Settlement is Not Achieved Cooperatively?
In
the event the parties are unable to reach settlement, the lawyers withdraw
from the case and the parties are free to retain trial attorneys to pursue
their matter in court. The collaborative lawyer will assist the client in
obtaining an attorney who will litigate and confer with the new attorney
at no additional cost. |